Skip to content

DoiT Cloud Intelligence

Welcome to the DoiT Cloud Intelligence Customer Feedback Portal.

Please help us improve our product by providing feedback or ideas for new features.  Your input helps us improve our offerings and we pride ourselves on responding and reacting to ideas across our customer base.  When leaving an idea, please be as specific as possible about the problem you are encountering and what your ideal solution looks like.  

Thank you in advance for your comments
If you have any questions please file a ticket in our Console

DoiT Cloud Intelligence

Categories

JUMP TO ANOTHER FORUM

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

3 results found

  1. Expand our existing cost anomaly detection using the billing data to also support the anomaly detection on the usage data

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Cost Anomalies  ·  Admin →
  2. Hello Team,

    Customers currently can add an Attribution for Anomaly Detection to monitor abnormal spend behavior on a specific segment of their business. A customer just surfaced the need of excluding a specific Attribution from the Anomaly Detection logic due to the nature of that segment of the business, where they are expecting those anomalies to happen. The desired outcome would be that all infrastructure linked to that Attribution would not be flowing into the Cost Anomaly algorithm, hence the anomalies would not get surfaced as per customer preference.

    Do you think this would be possible?

    Kind Regards,

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Can be done currently by disabling default anomalies and monitoring for anomalies an attribution that excludes the desired selection.

  3. We'd like to adjust our anomaly detection to allow selection of custom cost tag.

    For instance, our primary cost tag is the Component tag, we now often get SKU-based anomalies that aren’t anomalies when looking at en entire Component tag value.

    For instance: We may have a cluster tagged with Component=EMRCluster1 that switched from using one type of EC2 instance to the other. This will show up as an anomaly, but the entire service under this Component tag didn't necessarily have an anomaly.

    30-50% of the anomalies we get now are now red herrings because of this.

    My questions:
    -…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    This is currently possible using the allocations. We understand that manual work is required to create multiple allocations however it is just a one time effort. We are declining it for now as it doesn't take higher priority than the other capabilities planned for anomaly detections however we will be revisiting this in the future once we get more customer data.

  • Don't see your idea?