Skip to content

DoiT Cloud Intelligence

Welcome to the DoiT Cloud Intelligence Customer Feedback Portal.

Please help us improve our product by providing feedback or ideas for new features.  Your input helps us improve our offerings and we pride ourselves on responding and reacting to ideas across our customer base.  When leaving an idea, please be as specific as possible about the problem you are encountering and what your ideal solution looks like.  

Thank you in advance for your comments
If you have any questions please file a ticket in our Console

DoiT Cloud Intelligence

Categories

JUMP TO ANOTHER FORUM

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

29 results found

  1. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    We opted for using labels instead of folders for this purpose. You can do this by navigating to https://console.doit.com/analytics/all and editing labels there. You need the "Labels Manager" permission (enabled by default for Admins and other roles).

  2. More Advanced Kubernetes Metrics

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Kubernetes  ·  Admin →
  3. Customers will generally be interested in cloud incidents specific to the regions they use. It would be helpful if there was an option to include a region-specific filter on the cloud incidents page. This would help to provide more meaningful data.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
  4. Hey la Product Team !

    Summary:
    Customers require access to granular and raw AWS cost and usage data that mirrors the level of detail found in AWS's Cost and Usage Report (CUR).
    The current DoiT console and API provide aggregated data, which lacks some of the required keys present in AWS CUR, such as 'usage start' and 'usage end' dates. Additionally, the inability to fetch the full dataset with a single query
    needs to run multiple requests and merging, which is not ideal and raises concerns about potential performance issues.

    Request details:
    Direct access to raw data: provide a method…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
  5. We'd like to adjust our anomaly detection to allow selection of custom cost tag.

    For instance, our primary cost tag is the Component tag, we now often get SKU-based anomalies that aren’t anomalies when looking at en entire Component tag value.

    For instance: We may have a cluster tagged with Component=EMRCluster1 that switched from using one type of EC2 instance to the other. This will show up as an anomaly, but the entire service under this Component tag didn't necessarily have an anomaly.

    30-50% of the anomalies we get now are now red herrings because of this.

    My questions:
    -…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    This is currently possible using the allocations. We understand that manual work is required to create multiple allocations however it is just a one time effort. We are declining it for now as it doesn't take higher priority than the other capabilities planned for anomaly detections however we will be revisiting this in the future once we get more customer data.

  6. We use DoiT to create Attributions to allow us to view client-specific costs. Overall this works well for us.

    One improvement would be if we could configure Attribution "templates" containing specific fields even if the data doesn't exist yet. For example, only a subset of our customers are using Dataproc and so only that subset of customer data is labelled in the billing data. When I create a new Attribution I must exclude our dataproc label for the customer if their data doesn't exist yet. Eventually, when the customer migrates to Dataproc, their Attribution will be incorrectly missing the data…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  7. Currently you can only do full month comparisons which makes it cumbersome to quickly compare how you're doing this month vs last at a granular level.

    For example, we're currently 22 days into May. I want to see this month vs up to the 22nd of last month.

    It's possible to do this breaking it down by days, but that gets very tedious trying to scroll up and down to compare the data, losing your place etc.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    You can do this by adding the "Day" dimension in the "Group by" section in the left panel in Reports.


    You can also select view options like "Row Heatmap" to make it easier to see days where there has been an increase vs. decrease.

  8. When report graphs are plotted against time, allow the time zone to be set.

    I recently investigated a cost increase due to database activity. The cost anomaly graph and report were shown in UTC. I understand this is the time zone AWS reports the costings, but it would be very helpful for me to align the spike in usage with some event at work, without having to convert the time zones.

    This will not make much different for daily/monthly graphs, but I was looking at an hourly graph, where having the times displayed in local time zone would be very…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  9. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Declined  ·  0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
2 Next →
  • Don't see your idea?