Skip to content

DoiT Cloud Intelligence

Welcome to the DoiT Cloud Intelligence Customer Feedback Portal.

Please help us improve our product by providing feedback or ideas for new features.  Your input helps us improve our offerings and we pride ourselves on responding and reacting to ideas across our customer base.  When leaving an idea, please be as specific as possible about the problem you are encountering and what your ideal solution looks like.  

Thank you in advance for your comments
If you have any questions please file a ticket in our Console

DoiT Cloud Intelligence

Categories

JUMP TO ANOTHER FORUM

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

20 results found

  1. 7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. 5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  APIs  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. Hello Team,

    One of the main priorities for the customer is to be able to amortize their reservation costs (OpenSearch) in this case. The customer went through CUR backfill and would like to be able to see those costs amortized.

    Currently this is not supported, and they will only be able to use amortized cost reporting going forward on their new data.

    The ask would be to enable Amortized Cost reporting on historical data, so the customer can benefit from this feature as soon as they get access to it within Navigator regardless the data being a historical backfill.

    Kind…

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. Additionally, the DoiT budget report doesn't include taxes, while our AWS budget does. Could it be possible to customize the configuration to include taxes in the budget cost?

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. When splitting a shared cost (eg. "Shared Infrastructure" grouping) by other Attributions (eg. "Product 1" and "Product 2"), customer would like to be able to show only part of the result in a report.

    At the moment it is not possible to build a report that combines eg. 30% of "Shared Infrastructure" with "Product 1" and shows the cost of only this. It is only possible to designate a full 100% split of "Shared Infrastructure" and the report must show each Attribution included in the split.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. Please make it possible to rename the slack connect channel.

    The slack channel for notifications was automatically created and added to our organization as a shared slack connect channel. The name of this channel is just our company name, so it is really hard to see that this channel is actually related to doit

    Usually our slack connect channels have the name of both companies so you can immediately see which partner organization the channel belongs to

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. Every project that was billed in an invoice should stay as is in the reports, regardless of the current sate of the billing profile and accounts/projects assigned to.

    Currently, when using the "Invoice" chip, one needs to select the invoice bucket/billing profile. If a project/account has been removed in the meantime, even when selecting time range when project/account xxx was present - it does not show in the report, as the Invoice filter takes into account only projects/account already present in the billing prifle/invoice bucket

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. Customer would like to clean up the GCP Lens by removing the CUD utilization widgets since there is no data to be shown at the moment.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. Enable Drag & Drop of images / files while opening Support Requests, similar to (for example) Gitlab experience

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. Customer would like to be able to download all data from invoice explainer into a table.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. When I go to the Console, it requires that I log in again. I think it times out after a day. Other apps, including secure ones, allow much more time before timing out.

    Some apps are transactional, so you log in occasionally to perform specific tasks. But if we want to have a true "console" it needs to be convenient and available.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hello - this is our way to re-authenticate users who've been authenticated with SSO/Google/Microsoft periodically. The reason it is needed is because in case a user is removed from the SSO IdP/Google/Microsoft by the organization we don't want him to remain active in our Console.

  12. Can we add profile pictures to the portal?
    Request to add a picture so everyone can visualize who they are talking to

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. Customer would like to have the ability to rename their AWS assets from the DoiT Cloud Navigator.
    They understand that it would technically be easier to edit these directly in each account's AWS Console, but they work in a decentralised fashion with several different teams/companies managing each of these accounts, making it very difficult for them to edit these in practice, so they would like to have the ability to change/rename their AWS assets from the DoiT Cloud Navigator.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. "Make a Wish” https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7242910404618715136/

    Make the "Feedback/Idea/Wish" Button more prominent to foster more innovation.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. AWS has the option to pay for more updated data in Cost Explorer. When a customer already pays for this, they would like to see it available in Navigator reporting.

    https://docs.aws.amazon.com/cost-management/latest/userguide/ce-hourly-granularity.html

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. Based on a customer request, breakdown of FlexCUD coverage by machine type and project. the following report shows most of the data but the calculation is more complex and cannot be achieved in a report. FlexCUD Lens or dashboard could be created to show: 1. coverage percentage 2. effective discount achieved

    https://console.doit.com/customers/Rl1kjaWwmyf0rtrLhqQf/analytics/reports/oSn3P22Xr40hXV072ibX

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. Feature Request: Cloud Vendor Filtering
    This is just a suggestion - since we onboarded AWS (previously we only had GCP) it's gotten annoying to filter each cloud vendor when I want to look at it specifically.

    I'd suggest adding the option to filter cloud vendors (AWS, GCP, Azure, etc) somewhere else and not under the Filter drop-down menu.

    Doing these multiple clicks each time isn't very convenient.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. Customer is using the multi organizational features and would like for the admins to be able to create reports and share them to specific organizations with in their tenant. This would allow them to easily create reports for the individual org and share them out to the correct groups of users.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. Customer is beginning to leverage the multi org features with in Navigator and would like those features to extend to the Consulting and Support area as well. They would like for the ticket history to only show tickets that have been opened by member of that specific Organization. They are trying to seperate everything out and would like those additional controls in place.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. We'd like to adjust our anomaly detection to allow selection of custom cost tag.

    For instance, our primary cost tag is the Component tag, we now often get SKU-based anomalies that aren’t anomalies when looking at en entire Component tag value.

    For instance: We may have a cluster tagged with Component=EMRCluster1 that switched from using one type of EC2 instance to the other. This will show up as an anomaly, but the entire service under this Component tag didn't necessarily have an anomaly.

    30-50% of the anomalies we get now are now red herrings because of this.

    My questions:
    -…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?