Skip to content

DoiT Cloud Intelligence

Welcome to Customer Voice!

Have an idea? Share it. Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap.

Tell us the problem you’re facing and what your ideal solution looks like. The more specific you are, the faster we can act.

DoiT Cloud Intelligence

Categories

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

10 results found

  1. I want to schedule a Workshop with CREs, included with my DCI subscription, I should not have to go through the headache of a long contract process to get started.

    When I go to Request a Workshop, I should be presented with Terms and Conditions so that we agree to the necessary customer, delivery and timeline expectations and acknowledge them.

    Once I have agreed to the Workshop terms and conditions, my request should go directly to a CRE, not my account manager.

    25 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    In Progress  ·  1 comment  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. Please reinstate and expand DoIT's Flexsave for RDS/Databases option. AWS's recent announcement of Database Savings Plans should help DoIT mitigate the risks of unused capacity and make Flexsave for RDS/Databases feasible. Ideally, Flexsave for RDS/Databases should work similarly to Flexsave for Compute.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. Please reinstate and expand DoIT's Flexsave for RDS/Databases option. AWS's recent announcement of Database Savings Plans should greatly help DoIT mitigate the risks of unused capacity.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. A tool in the UI to manage CUDs / spend reservations. It’s currently fairly manual, and the out-of-the-box tools AWS and GCP provide don’t entirely help.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Discovery  ·  0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. New Navigation is a little bit confusing. Maybe it's just me but I have a hard times finding what I need. Before everything was in one place (horizontal links in navbar) and now it's hidden behind the menu which feels very heavy and each time I end up looking for the link

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. To support the proposed console integration of internal PSS support flow, we'd like the Console's Expert Inquiry to support the following:
    - recognise "visibility" attribute to determine if a product should be hidden from customer in the dropdown list
    - when a Doer is creating a new request under a customer tenant, a pop up dialog should be presented for the Doer to select whether the ticket will be private or viewable by the customer

    Please refer to the following requirement document for more details, including tags, assignee and UI mock-ups: https://doitintl.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/fde/pages/1623883778/DoiT+Console+PSS+Internal+Request+Flow+Requirements

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    In Backlog  ·  0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. Currently, all admins bypass SSO completely, which is a security gap since those sensitive accounts are the ones we need to be secured the most. I understand the use case for having a breakglass account, but making all admins bypass it with no way to enforce it defeats the purpose of having SSO enabled to begin with.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. Currently, when searching for an AWS account or GCP project, the result is just a static link to the asset details page. To check costs or settings, I have to click the result, wait for the page to load, and then navigate through menus again.

    Please make the search results more dynamic by adding "Quick Actions" directly in the dropdown. When I search for an asset ID, I would like to see buttons to:

    Open a Cost Report filtered specifically for that account.

    Go directly to the Cloud Flow or Attribution settings for that account.

    This would significantly reduce the…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. Currently, customers using the Doit console to purchase Microsoft 365 subscriptions or licenses are limited to monthly billing. Annual subscriptions require direct engagement with our sales team. This necessitates the creation of annual contracts, often for a small number of licenses, which consumes significant time in managing Ironclad and Salesforce for minimal revenue.

    To improve efficiency, I propose enabling customers to purchase a limited number of Microsoft 365 licenses (e.g., fewer than 50) through our console with both monthly and annual billing options. This would significantly reduce the administrative overhead associated with low-volume annual contracts.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. Hi,

    I love https://compute.doit.com/spot. It might be better if you can also show the table view and allow user to filter by number of vcpu or memory. It will help us to plan for instance type we should use.

    Thank you

    0 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?